SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    Virtual Training Modalities: How To Choose the Best Option?


    Does your company need to implement a virtual training program?

    If this is the case, you've probably done a lot of research on the subject, including providers, tools, and methods. By now you’ve probably discovered there are so many different forms of virtual training available, from eLearning, mobile learning, to blended learning courses. Each method has its own benefits and its best use cases.

    If you’re wondering which modality is more effective; there is no easy answer for that. Making a decision comes down to the individual needs of the company, as well as the expected organizational outcomes.

    So, before resuming your research, ask yourself this question: What are your company’s training needs?


    Answering this is the first step to choosing the option that best suits what you really need for your company. It will also help you gather the right information to support and build the business case for your training project.

    How to Choose the Best Option? 

    Picking the right virtual training method for your company does not involve just deciding over the most innovative or latest trend; as leader of a training project, you should ask yourself the following questions too:

    • What are your training goals? (Update Skills? Teach new skills?  Change workplace behavior? Compliance?)
    • What is the target audience? (New hires? Upper management?)
    • What type of content is being presented? 
    • What knowledge, skills and attitudes need to be developed?
    • What is the infrastructure that your company actually has?
    • What type of media or devices does the target audience use on a daily basis?

    methods-1.jpg

    Types

    Now, get to know the different virtual training modalities and make the best decision for your business:

    • E-learning (Electronic Learning): Self-paced, web-based learning approach in which participants use technology to access training. No instructor is involved. It is delivered asynchronously. Students have control over the time, place or pace.
    • Blended Learning: A hybrid approach that combines scheduled, synchronous, traditional classroom settings and asynchronous, non-scheduled virtual or digitally enabled learning.
    • Rapid eLearning: Contemplates the use of tools and applications to deliver learning, in short, quick electronic-based modules. The term makes reference to the speed at which a course can be completed by a course participant. Often it is also referred to as “Bite Size” learning.
    • Mobile Learning: learning delivered through mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets. The key here is not the device; it’s student mobility.
    • Ubiquitous learning: Ubiquitous learning is the evolution of mobile learning. It involves making training available across all channels, anywhere and anytime. Learning activities are embedded in daily tasks. More on this topic here. 

    Characteristics

    Then, let’s identify the specific characteristics of each virtual training modality:

    2-final.png

    Click here to enlarge image.

    Tips for choosing the best virtual learning modality

    1-final.png

    Click here to enlarge image.

    visual design crash course


     REFERENCES:

    Aretio, L. G. (2004). Aprendizaje Móvil, m-learning. Boletín Electrónico de Noticias de Educación a Distancia.

    Aretio, L. G. (2004). Blended Learning, ¿Enseñanza y aprendizaje integrados? Boletín Electrónico de Noticias de Educación a Distancia.

    Aretio, L. G. (2004). Blended Learning, ¿Es tan innovador? Boletín Electrónico de Noticias de Educación a Distancia.

    Cabero, J. (2006). Bases pedagógicas del e-learning. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento . UNESCO.

    Conde González, M. Á. (2007). mLearning, de camino hacia el uLearning. Tesis de Máster . Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.

    Contreras Bravo, L. E., González Guerrero, K., & Fuentes López, H. J. (2011). Uso de las TIC y especialmente del Blended Learning en la enseñanza universitaria. Revista Educación y Desarollo Social .

    Hernández, T. (2009). Educación sin tiempo: ¿M-learning o U-learning en la Investigación y Docencia? Universidad Rafael Belloso Chacin.

    Pérez, V. R., Ortíz, A. P., & Lugo, L. E. (2014). Conceptos para el desarrollo de un modelo de formación en competencias tecnológicas para Colombia. HALLAZGOS (22) . Bogotá: Universidad Santo Tomás.

    Zambrano, J. (2009). Aprendizaje móvil (m-learning). Bogotá: Inventum.

    State of Employee Training 2015 - Infographic https://www.westuc.com/en-us/blog/digital-media-services/state-employee-training-2015-infographic

     

    Jonatan Bautista
    Jonatan Bautista
    Pedagogo egresado de la FFyL-UNAM. Su experiencia profesional se centra en el Diseño instruccional y la Tecnología educativa.

    Related Posts

    The Smarter Training Roadmap for 2026

    If January has taught us anything, it’s that the "Content Factory" era is officially behind us. Throughout this month, we’ve explored a single, driving truth: In 2026, the measure of L&D success isn't how much we build, but how well we support business execution. We started the year by asking a hard question: Is your training busy, or is it effective? We looked at why organizations are stripping away the complexity of EdTech to focus on what matters, ecosystems that reduce development time and personalized journeys that actually stick. We also introduced the concept of Microlearning 3.0, powered by AI tools like SHIFT Meteora, which moves beyond simple "short content" to deliver AI-driven performance support directly in the flow of work. As we wrap up our focus on Smarter Training for Better Business Results, let’s distill these insights into a final roadmap. Here is how you can ensure your team doesn't just "do" training this year but drives the kind of data-driven results the C-Suite celebrates.

    Ultra-Short Tip: How to Turn Training into Results (Without Creating More Courses)

    In previous articles, we saw that training no longer competes for "more content," but for better execution. The next step is moving from "delivering learning" to "activating performance" at the exact moments where the business wins or loses. In 2026, the problem isn’t a lack of training. The problem is that, even with training, execution remains inconsistent: everyone solves problems "their own way," errors are repeated, and results depend on who handles the case. Smart training shifts the focus: it doesn't design to cover topics; it designs to standardize critical decisions that drive business KPIs.

    Smart Training in 2026: Learning That Impacts Results

    In 2026, training stops being measured by completed courses and starts being measured by execution. Organizations achieving real impact don’t train by topic: they design learning around the critical moments where decisions are made, errors happen, and business results are defined. The Real Problem L&D Faces Today In this new stage of L&D, the conversation no longer revolves around “what course is missing,” but around a much more relevant question for the business: