SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    The Story behind eLearning Authoring Tools

    A few years back, a group of entrepreneurs were pondering at the question every e Learning organization has:  what is the right balance between cost, development time and quality.  No organization is immune from this dilemma.

    The entrepreneurs were trying to figure out a way to break the paradigm and find a way where organizations would be able to reduce cost, development time while maintaining or even augmenting quality and reliability.  It was no surprise to anybody that labor had, by far, the largest impact in overall cost and on time-to-market.

    The analysis took many different paths, but in the end, the conclusion was that a method to reduce labor without affecting the end product was needed.

    A detailed value chain analysis for the e Learning development process was conducted and several conclusions were reached:

    a- The instructional design process is critical and where the learning strategy is formulated and to a significant degree, executed.

    b-The graphic design process is essential for the user experience; however, parallel to the creative aspect, there are underlying mechanical, repetitive, time consuming processes.

    c- The programming stage, needed for most things more complex than a page turner, was mostly mechanical, prone to wrong interpretations, programming bugs and human error.

    The group also interviewed end customers and created a value matrix, where different stages were given different "value score".  The result was that the end user appreciated an engaging story, dynamic, interactive and effective experience, usable interface, but did not care much how many work hours it took to design the interface or how many days it took to program the functionality.  The user just cared for a great learning experience.

    A bit unfair for the development team, but users pressed for a better product, faster and as always, with a limited budget.

    After going through several options, the group chose the winning solution was radical process automation through technology.  By automating those time consuming, repetitive tasks, organizations would be able to dramatically save labor, be able to deliver much more quickly and reduce human error.

    Next step:  creating the technology..
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.