SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    Have you identified best practices? It’s time to standardize them!

    Take a look at your surroundings for a moment and observe the different tasks performed…

    • Have you stopped and analyzed the different activities involved in the production process? 
    • Have you identified which of these can be called “best practices”?

    This article will be very useful if you’ve never had those doubts before or if solving them has become a priority in your company.

    Characterize your eLearning production processes

    A process is defined as a series of joint tasks performed in order to accomplish a specific product. In the case of eLearning we can state that the production process is made up of a series of activities used to develop a learning strategy or a specific course.benefits

    According to the type of organization or characteristics it may have, there are several methods you can follow when determining this process. On one end we have absolute experimentation, where people have complete freedom to carry out tasks as they please because parameters have not been set, but on the other hand we have a process that’s completely defined, where activities are structured and must be performed according to predefined standards. 

    In between both extremes there’s a case where some actions are already defined but not to a point of complete specificity. 

    There is always the possibility of formalizing or characterizing the process when needed, regardless of how it was established in the first place.

     

    What does characterizing a process mean?

    We refer to characterizing as identifying and defining all factors that get involved in a process and that should be controlled.

     Of course we can state a great deal of elements or activities that have to be characterized in order to obtain an eLearning product, but there are three fundamental variables that should be considered when defining a production process:

    • Content development: It’s the main element when developing an eLearning course; therefore its characteristics will be directly related to the end results obtained.
    • Project management: Efficiency in project management can lead to the fulfillment of goals and the organization of risks that may come in your way.  
    • Quality assurance: Looking out for quality and following standards in the process will be reflected in the quality of the end results obtained. 

    How can we know if a process is completely defined? 

    When we’re able to state all steps and activities needed to execute a process and those activities can be measured in a simple and objective manner, we’re able to state that the process has been completely defined.

    Once we’re sure that the process has been completely characterized, you will need to implement it. Even though this is the last phase, it’s essential to the process’s success, due to the fact that there can be some sort of resistance towards change which can be controlled appropriately when detected on time.

    Just like all other areas of technology, when it comes to eLearning it has to be as flexible as possible in order to adapt itself to the needs of an ever changing market and industry but at the same time it has to be well defined in order to ensure a predictable result that meets all predefined goals. 

    elearning production process

    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.