SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    Three reasons collaboration works for eLearning projects

    Collaboration is and will be a hot topic in business for a while.  In the eLearning industry, collaboration works when the act of collaboration simplifies the life of the stakeholders involved.

    Three reasons collaboration works for eLearning projects:collaboration

    • Knowledge mining:  especially for large organizations, geographically spread, getting most experts aligned on content is critical.  If localization to other languages is part of the scope, even more essential collaboration will be.  Another important element is that stakeholders feel involved in the process and are partially “owners” of the content so that they won’t “reject” it in the future.

    • Development:  Content on local hard drives and even sent by FTP are becoming less popular.  Collaboration that integrates media management in the cloud is becoming more and more popular because wait times and transfer times trend to zero.  A centralized, consistent repository is desirable.

    • Approval: Very hard not to have lots of stakeholders wanting to add or delete or improve content.  The key is to make these changes in real time.  Going from discussion to change to finished product in real time.  The discussion-edit-review process will likely loop a few times, so even more critical is to have the technology and methods to collaborate in real time to accomplish these loops as quickly as possible.

    describe the image

     

    Click me

    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    The Smarter Training Roadmap for 2026

    If January has taught us anything, it’s that the "Content Factory" era is officially behind us. Throughout this month, we’ve explored a single, driving truth: In 2026, the measure of L&D success isn't how much we build, but how well we support business execution. We started the year by asking a hard question: Is your training busy, or is it effective? We looked at why organizations are stripping away the complexity of EdTech to focus on what matters, ecosystems that reduce development time and personalized journeys that actually stick. We also introduced the concept of Microlearning 3.0, powered by AI tools like SHIFT Meteora, which moves beyond simple "short content" to deliver AI-driven performance support directly in the flow of work. As we wrap up our focus on Smarter Training for Better Business Results, let’s distill these insights into a final roadmap. Here is how you can ensure your team doesn't just "do" training this year but drives the kind of data-driven results the C-Suite celebrates.

    Ultra-Short Tip: How to Turn Training into Results (Without Creating More Courses)

    In previous articles, we saw that training no longer competes for "more content," but for better execution. The next step is moving from "delivering learning" to "activating performance" at the exact moments where the business wins or loses. In 2026, the problem isn’t a lack of training. The problem is that, even with training, execution remains inconsistent: everyone solves problems "their own way," errors are repeated, and results depend on who handles the case. Smart training shifts the focus: it doesn't design to cover topics; it designs to standardize critical decisions that drive business KPIs.

    Smart Training in 2026: Learning That Impacts Results

    In 2026, training stops being measured by completed courses and starts being measured by execution. Organizations achieving real impact don’t train by topic: they design learning around the critical moments where decisions are made, errors happen, and business results are defined. The Real Problem L&D Faces Today In this new stage of L&D, the conversation no longer revolves around “what course is missing,” but around a much more relevant question for the business: