SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    Levels of Interactivity in eLearning: Which one do you need?

    If you are using eLearning resources, planning to develop or just interested in this type of training, you should know that eLearning courses can be classified according to the level of interactivity offered.

    According to these levels of interactivity you can determine how interactive you want your eLearning courses to be. Therefore, if you are just looking to distribute basic information, a simple page-turner course could meet your requirements. However, if you are looking for an actual engagement and interaction by the learner, a more interactive eLearning course is a must-have. Using the right amount of interactivity is key. Not necessarily the more interactive the course, the more effective it will be. Use the right type of interaction according to your needs and objectives.

    Which levels of interactivity do you need?

    The interaction level that fits the most for your company and your corporate objectives is based on many factors, for example:

    • The nature of the content
    • Your technological infrastructure
    • Budget
    • Target audience 

    Level of Interaction: is a metric used in eLearning that refers to concepts such as user interaction, complexity and level of sophistication of the course.

    Let's look at the details:

    elearning levels of interactivity

    Level 1. Passive-no interaction

    This level is what is commonly referred to as ‘page-turners'. The course is linear and could be considered basic training, in which the student acts only as an information receiver.

    Basically, the sequence of screens is fixed and the student can not choose the order in which you want to see the content, return to a previous topic or browse freely. It is a level that isn’t very motivating to the learner. This is barely considered eLearning, however it can be effective for communicating simple concepts, and is relatively inexpensive to develop.

    At this level learners do not interact with resources, they just have:

    • Graphics, images and simple animations 
    • Rollovers 
    • Basic quiz questions

    Level 2. Limited interaction

    In this case, the course continues to be basic, but the student has more control over their training; they have the ability to do more than just watch, read and navigate. This level is used for non-complex operations and maintenance lessons.

    At this level learners interact with resources such as: 

    • Clickable animated graphics
    • Navigation expands to menus, glossaries, and links to external resources. 
    • Often includes simple exercises (i.e. drag-and-drop, matching, and identification components). 
    • Audio and video. 

    Level 3. Moderate interaction

    At Level 3 there is a high degree of complexity and customization of the course. In addition the student has more control over their training and perceives the course as a participative and dynamic activity and not just a presentation of content.

    This level is a favorite in the industry mainly because it optimized the balance between active learning and development time. Some resources: 

    • Animated Videos
    • Customised Audio recording
    • Complex simulations where the learners enter data into fields
    • Scenario-based cases 
    • Custom Flash Animations where learners have the ability to investigate.

    Level 4. Simulation and game-based learning

    This level gives the highest degree of interaction by the student.

    The course includes simulations and the contents are transmitted through the use of educational games to keep the student motivated.

    • Real-time learning. 
    • Use of gaming technology. 
    • 3D simulations: for example software or hardware simulations and serious games.
    • Includes variety of multimedia (i.e. custom videos and interactive 3D objects).
    • The usage of digital ‘avatars’.
    • Basically involves all of the elements of levels 1, 2, and 3 plus recharged interactivity; and greater levels of sophistication. 

    Keep in mind that in the corporate world it is important to have highly interactive training for engaging and keeping your employees coming back for more. We encourage you to check out these ideas on how to start creating more interactive content


    Are you creating interactive eLearning courses? Will this encourage you to experiment with other levels of interactivity you weren't using? Are you providing a motivating experience for your employees?

     Checklist  

     

          Click me
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.