SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    10 Ways Most Firms Go Wrong on eLearning Projects

    eLearning implementationMore and more businesses are finding eLearning solutions to be a successful and cost-effective way of solving their training needs; unfortunately, just as many companies are running into a host of problems with the development and implementation of their eLearning projects. Once these problems are identified, the solutions can be developed; many of those solutions can be provided by the SHIFT.

    What are they wasting time on? What are they needlessly doing? What are they doing wrong? What can they stop doing? What can they improve? This blog post enlists just ten activities companies are doing wrong -- so it's time to eliminate them for good!

    Development Problems

    In some ways, almost all problems with eLearning projects are development problems, as that is the point at which most issues occur, but many of those problems are not realized until implementation. There are several issues that can arise and be identified during the project development process, and if properly identified, can be averted before they completely derail a project.

    1. Unrealistic Goals and Deadlines: As a result of poor communication between the project development team and the stakeholders, expectations for eLearning projects can often become distorted or unrealistic, with managers expecting innovative and high-quality eLearning solutions with a low budget and tight deadlines. Clear and realistic communication can resolve this issue.

    2. Shifting Project Goals: The development team starts working on a project, but the stakeholders change its focus or add goals to it midstream, resulting in a cobbled-together, subpar result. By keeping project goals clear at the outset and sticking to them, this issue can be avoided.

    3. Trying to Fit In Too Much Content: An eLearning project can only hold so much information, because the learner can only assimilate so much information. Trying to expand the depth and breadth of an eLearning solution can make it too dense and inaccessible to the user. Developers should focus on the most important information and ways of conveying it clearly.

    4. Inexperienced Project Manager: A good project manager with plenty of eLearning development experience can anticipate problems and guide the team away from them; an inexperienced manager will be playing catch-up and find himself reacting to problems that have already spiraled out of control.

    Implementation Problems

    Some issues aren't visible until "the rubber meets the road," and the eLearning project is offered to users. Rather than trying to resolve them after the fact, they should be averted entirely during development.

    5. Poor Content: This is an issue that crops up early in project development; the source material or content drafts are simply bad – poorly written, poorly researched, or confusing. This is often the result of too few pairs of eyes reviewing them before they are incorporated into the program software. SHIFT eLearning solutions allow easy collaboration in real time, giving your developers instant feedback on their content drafts. Spending time getting the source content before you build it in the course is crucial—word documents are easier to change than eLearning content!

    6. Poor Design: Graphics are distracting rather than illustrative, colors are jarring, content is organized in a counter-intuitive and confusing way. The collaborative power of SHIFT eLearning software, and sufficient project time, will help avoid this issue.

    7. Lack of Interactivity: This is one of the biggest problems that arises in eLearning projects. When learners passively watch or simply click through a program, they absorb less information. Moreover, using an authoring tool like SHIFT it becomes easy to incorporate interactive features like games, quizzes, scenarios and video.

    8. Project Fails to Meet Design Goals: The program doesn't successfully convey the information intended. This can be averted with sufficient project time and collaborative feedback on project materials.

    9. Project Fails to Meet User Needs: The project stakeholders failed to understand the needs of their learners; the best way to avoid this is through careful market research at the outset of the project.

    10. Lack of Marketing: The project stakeholders failed to understand the needs of their learners; the best way to avoid this is through careful market research at the outset of the project.

    It is important for eLearning developers, instructional designers and trainers per se to analyze these common mistakes and explore solutions to keep a growing base of best practices for effective eLearning courses.

    To permanently avoid these and similar frustrations, remember the simple formula:

    Solid eLearning Strategy + Learner-Centric Approach + Interactive and Remarkable Content = Successful eLearning. 

           Click me
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.