SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    The Different Levels of Boredom in eLearning Content

    Boring eLearning is a huge problem for learners and instructors alike. Most of students, quite understandably, avoid them like plague. Everyone in the teaching and training profession knows this. The problem is, why are people still creating boring courses?

    In a classroom setting where the instructor acts as a “sage on the stage,” hundreds of learners are literally put to sleep because of boredom. Students are merely passive observers and are given little or no opportunities to participate. The truth is, this same scenario happens in distance learning too. Online lessons are often boring for the same reasons that in-person classes are boring.

    The problem of boredom won’t go away simply by avoiding it. You have to acknowledge it first before you can solve it. Here’s how.

    Start with an eLearning Boredom Barometer:

    An in-depth boredom grader for eLearning developed by Janet Clarey is a very useful guide. This simple grader she created, checks for boredom in five levels:

    describe the image

    Level I: Severe risk of boredom

    This worst scenario includes every bad thing in a course. It's extremely passive, stale and offers nothing valuable to students. Heavy on facts, the material is pointless and irrelevant, hence downright boring. It pushes too much content at people without follow up or evaluation. This is when you offer readers long chunks of text without any purposeful breaks. When you have cluttered screens without purposeful interactivity or graphics. Or when you keep on using a technical language and take too long to get to your point.

    Level II:  High risk of boredom

    This is a pretty bad scenario but just a little better than the first. Clarey refers to this level as the “risk of eLearning carpal tunnel syndrome” where developers create a “click-next” style course. This usually happens when they digitize or turn the whole book into an unlimited number of slides that can go on for hours. It doesn't offer learners more than clicking the next button. Learners face repetitive tasks. Their participation level is zero. They must make an excessive number of clicks.  So tiresomeness and boredom set in quickly. Bottom-line: Read, click, repeat learning is VERY boring! 

    Level III: Significant risk of boredom

    Here students are presented with a moderate, less text-heavy type of material. The course may contain some images and some media, nothing more. You list a bunch of learning objectives, present raw concepts, and ask some multiple choice questions at the end. That's it. It's all show and no go. There’s something in it but it doesn’t stimulate the interest of students. The images are generic stock photos that doesn’t catch their attention at all.

    You basically have a page-turning presentation spiced with graphics, audio and video. It's great you include multimedia and visuals, but if they aren't really contributing anything to the course, they may end up distracting the learner from the subject instead.

    Level IV: General risk of boredom

    The situation here is getting better but it’s still far from the ideal. The course may have a little bit of interactivity but not the authentic kind. The gee-wiz factor takes over. The course is disguised as student-centered by dressing it up with interactions and media. It may even start off right but becomes boring after a short while. 

    Watch out for interactivity that doesn’t provide authentic interaction. Notice how students behave once they reach the middle of your course. You may wow them at the beginning but no amount of animation can stop them from getting bored. True engagement comes from being asked to think and respond intelligently, rather than simply clicking multiple-choice bubbles or watching videos.

    Level V: Low risk of boredom

    This is the ideal scenario. Your course is fun, relevant and challenging. All the right elements are in the right place. The multimedia is well-placed and the simulations are challenging. You have a good selection of images that actually contribute to the students’ learning goals. The text is thoughtfully crafted using a conversational tone. The course reads like a realistic story. It makes learners want to hear more and respond to the task.

    If this sounds like your own material, you’re on the right track.

    But what if it’s not? What if your material is, indeed, boring? It’s okay. You can revise it. Get your content turned around fast without sacrificing engagement. Make sure keep the 3Ms in mind: meaningful, memorable and motivating. These three forms a learner-centered eLearning experience.

    secrets effective elearning
    Click me
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.