SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    The Different Levels of Boredom in eLearning Content

    Boring eLearning is a huge problem for learners and instructors alike. Most of students, quite understandably, avoid them like plague. Everyone in the teaching and training profession knows this. The problem is, why are people still creating boring courses?

    In a classroom setting where the instructor acts as a “sage on the stage,” hundreds of learners are literally put to sleep because of boredom. Students are merely passive observers and are given little or no opportunities to participate. The truth is, this same scenario happens in distance learning too. Online lessons are often boring for the same reasons that in-person classes are boring.

    The problem of boredom won’t go away simply by avoiding it. You have to acknowledge it first before you can solve it. Here’s how.

    Start with an eLearning Boredom Barometer:

    An in-depth boredom grader for eLearning developed by Janet Clarey is a very useful guide. This simple grader she created, checks for boredom in five levels:

    describe the image

    Level I: Severe risk of boredom

    This worst scenario includes every bad thing in a course. It's extremely passive, stale and offers nothing valuable to students. Heavy on facts, the material is pointless and irrelevant, hence downright boring. It pushes too much content at people without follow up or evaluation. This is when you offer readers long chunks of text without any purposeful breaks. When you have cluttered screens without purposeful interactivity or graphics. Or when you keep on using a technical language and take too long to get to your point.

    Level II:  High risk of boredom

    This is a pretty bad scenario but just a little better than the first. Clarey refers to this level as the “risk of eLearning carpal tunnel syndrome” where developers create a “click-next” style course. This usually happens when they digitize or turn the whole book into an unlimited number of slides that can go on for hours. It doesn't offer learners more than clicking the next button. Learners face repetitive tasks. Their participation level is zero. They must make an excessive number of clicks.  So tiresomeness and boredom set in quickly. Bottom-line: Read, click, repeat learning is VERY boring! 

    Level III: Significant risk of boredom

    Here students are presented with a moderate, less text-heavy type of material. The course may contain some images and some media, nothing more. You list a bunch of learning objectives, present raw concepts, and ask some multiple choice questions at the end. That's it. It's all show and no go. There’s something in it but it doesn’t stimulate the interest of students. The images are generic stock photos that doesn’t catch their attention at all.

    You basically have a page-turning presentation spiced with graphics, audio and video. It's great you include multimedia and visuals, but if they aren't really contributing anything to the course, they may end up distracting the learner from the subject instead.

    Level IV: General risk of boredom

    The situation here is getting better but it’s still far from the ideal. The course may have a little bit of interactivity but not the authentic kind. The gee-wiz factor takes over. The course is disguised as student-centered by dressing it up with interactions and media. It may even start off right but becomes boring after a short while. 

    Watch out for interactivity that doesn’t provide authentic interaction. Notice how students behave once they reach the middle of your course. You may wow them at the beginning but no amount of animation can stop them from getting bored. True engagement comes from being asked to think and respond intelligently, rather than simply clicking multiple-choice bubbles or watching videos.

    Level V: Low risk of boredom

    This is the ideal scenario. Your course is fun, relevant and challenging. All the right elements are in the right place. The multimedia is well-placed and the simulations are challenging. You have a good selection of images that actually contribute to the students’ learning goals. The text is thoughtfully crafted using a conversational tone. The course reads like a realistic story. It makes learners want to hear more and respond to the task.

    If this sounds like your own material, you’re on the right track.

    But what if it’s not? What if your material is, indeed, boring? It’s okay. You can revise it. Get your content turned around fast without sacrificing engagement. Make sure keep the 3Ms in mind: meaningful, memorable and motivating. These three forms a learner-centered eLearning experience.

    secrets effective elearning
    Click me
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    Want Your eLearning Courses to Deliver Results? Avoid These Mistakes

    Feeling overwhelmed with AI shaking up the eLearning scene? As L&D leaders, you've been nailing it, smoothly running your training programs and adapting as tech evolves. But now, with AI's rapid rise, it's as if the game board has been flipped over. It's a common, yet dangerous assumption to think that just by integrating AI, all of our training challenges are solved. Beware—this overreliance is a trap! Here's the hard truth: AI, while transformative, is not a silver bullet. In the rush to embrace these new tools, many well-intentioned L&D leaders are making critical mistakes that could cripple the effectiveness of their eLearning initiatives. I totally get the frustration—it’s like suddenly, everyone expects you to have all the answers just because you've got the latest tech at your fingertips. But remember, it’s not all about AI. In the rush to integrate this new tech, I’ve seen too many skilled teams slip up in areas that have always been crucial—like course design, content relevance, and learner engagement. Let’s get real about these common pitfalls, ensuring you’re not just relying on AI but are also paying attention to the foundational elements of effective eLearning. This is your heads-up to keep your game tight, making sure your training programs are as powerful as ever, with or without the extra tech boost.

    The New Rules of Instructional Design in an AI-Driven World

    It’s no longer a question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) will change the way we work—it already has, and instructional design is no exception. What was once a futuristic concept is now a daily reality, reshaping how we approach learning and development at every level.

    The Future of Instructional Design in the AI Era

    Instructional design is at a crossroads. The rapid rise of AI is reshaping the field faster than many of us ever imagined, and it’s not just an incremental shift—it’s an industry-wide transformation. Entire workflows are being redefined, roles are evolving, and the expectations placed on L&D teams are skyrocketing.