SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    The eLearning Dilemma: Engaged vs Unengaged Learners

    Engaging the unengaged has always been an elusive goal among learning professionals. While there are challenges related to student engagement in other learning environments, online curriculum may include added obstacles. Problems revolve around the lack of personal interaction between the instructor and student, as well as the student-to-student contact. The eLearning environment can be isolating and prone to distraction. Long story short, engagement has always been a crucial component of learning—if not the first step to learning. 

    The proverbial questions are: what makes a learner engaged or unengaged? How do we make sure learners stay engaged, especially when something more exciting than their course is only a click away? To find the answers, we first need an in-depth look at the issue of engagement.

    Unengagement: the Biggest Challenge of Them All

    It's no secret trainers and educators consider disengaged students as one of the most challenging issues in their profession. As many as 25 percent to more than half of students are now disengaged. They're quickly bored with lectures and materials. Their "immersion in technology" is one of the known culprits.

    Today's students cling to the mobile devices. Their eyes are often glued to screens of all sizes and are presented with interactive and engaging visuals—from Instagram photos to YouTube videos. They are hardwired to multitask. This isn't an assumption but a reality.

    Expecting learners to sit still at their desks and be attentive for two hours a day, listening to content they deem unimportant is a recipe for failure. If students in your eLearning programs find it difficult to pay attention or participate in an activity, if they can see no purpose, relevance or connection to the learning material, then they're likely become disengaged.

    Here's a quick list of items that best describes this "unengaged" group:

    • Are often off task, delay completion of tasks or they don't complete tasks at all.
    • They don't participate or only observe things passively.
    • They only do minimum work and are satisfied with average results.
    • They avoid challenges.
    • They, openly or quietly, resist learning.
    • They're in a state of aversiveness (e.g., “this task is boring,” “there is nothing to do”).
    • Unsure of the expectations for learning.
    • Lack the ambition to authentically care about the content. 
    • Are apathetic towards individual development and goal attainment. 
    • Believe the course is unimportant and does not relate to their jobs or personal interests. 

    Engagement: The Essential Elements of an Engaged Learner 

    Engagement is generally defined as the level of participation and intrinsic motivation a student displays in a learning environment. It's also referred as “the amount of physical and psychological energy that the student devotes to the academic experience.” 

    When it comes to learner engagement, it involves both behaviors (such as persistence, effort, attention) and attitudes (such as motivation, enthusiasm and interest).

    The more engaged a student, researchers agree, the more they retain and the better they learn.

    Here's a quick list of how engaged learners behave:

    • Active and collaborative. Show sustained behavioral involvement in learning activities. 
    • They display a more positive emotional tone and are thus enthusiastic, passionate and optimistic about their learning endeavor.
    • They seek out help, whether inside or outside the course, to achieve learning goals.
    • They're naturally more curious and interested than unengaged students.
    • They exert their best effort and concentrate effectively when completing tasks.
    • On-task behavior, are focused on learning with minimum distractions. 
    • They enjoy and respond well to challenges. They persist despite challenges and figure out a way to overcome them. 
    • They display a 'can do' mentality and thus take pride on completing the course.
    • They try hard to learn what the course offers. They are not simply intrested in getting good grades, but in understanding the material and including this knowledge in their daily work. 

    Experts in the field of learning believe that there are certain experiential factors that influence student engagement. Relevance of instruction and perceived control are two such factors. 

    For an instructional material to be considered "relevant," it has to benefit students not only inside the course but in real-life settings as well. Students should see that the course fits into their long-term goals either at work or in their personal lives. Once students consider a course relevant to their needs, they would naturally involve themselves in it and thus become engaged. 

    Another factor is perceived control. Students want to feel that they are in control of their learning materials. Rather than impose a structure for them to follow, they want to have the freedom to structure their own course. This explains the rise of self-directed learning. People crave the flexibility to direct what and how they learn.

    Note that engagement in learning doesn't happen immediately or spotaneously. It might take time before students realize that their learning environments provide a rich source of opportunities to be explored. Remember, you can't really force them to pay attention. But you can actually inspire them take steps toward achieving their personal learning goals. 

    VFEngaged vs Disengaged corregido 01

    Winning eLearning

     

    Click me
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.