SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    The Psychology of How Learners Explore and Find Information Online

    Psychologists, eLearning professionals and other experts have always been interested in how we consume information online. Receiving and transmitting information are not new to us. But our entirely novel information environments are clearly shaping the way we search for and consume information. Today, "providing people with access to more information is not the problem. Rather, the problem is one of maximizing the allocation of human attention to information that will be useful.” 

    There are too many concepts and theories to mention but the most notable among them is the “Information Foraging Theory.” The term was first suggested by Pamela Sanstrom in 1994 and was later expanded by Pirolli and Stuart Card. The theory is based on the assumption that we humans use our built-in foraging mechanisms when searching for information. We inherited these mechanisms from our ancestors who forage or hunt for food. So it shouldn't surprise us that, today, we voraciously hunt for information instead of hunting for food. 

    Here are some relevant points of the theory. Feel free to carry out further research. It will certainly benefit your next eLearning project. 

    effective e learning courses

    1. Human beings are essentially “informavores.” They hunt for information. 

    Just as our ancestors hunt for feed, we modern-day humans search for ideal patches of information. Our daily searches on the Internet and even offline propensity to share information or gather around stories are good examples. If these aren't enough proof, stay at your desk for a while and wait. You'll most likely going to surf the web or grab a book. It's okay, all us are naturally chasing content. 

    As information foragers, we're also naturally inclined to decide quickly on certain information. Should we read on or ignore an article? Is the video worth our time or not? We select which information to consume or minimize thinking in order to better manage our energy. The most successful among us are those skilled at collecting the right information at the right time. 

    What this all means to eLearning developers is simple. You have to start considering how people actually consume and crave for information. This is especially true when you're dealing with an artificially designed information environment such as the Web. You can shape it into a more effective medium by factoring in information foraging patterns. Think about how we information-hungry beings point at and click on items we find interesting. Or how we process what we see online with what we already know. 

    In short, learners are informavores. To give them the kind of information they want, you'll have to know them better. 

    2. We follow information scents to find ideal patches of food.

    Researchers in Germany recently found that our heart, lung and blood cells are attracted to good food smells. But do you know that we also use visual clues—or information scent—to seek out ideal patches of information?

    People don't just scour a screen blindly. When entering an eLearning course, for instance, learners look for clues on the main page or menu and then decide whether or not to stay. If they don't find the first-screen information promising, they'll definitely look for ideal information patches elsewhere. They'll keep on clicking and following links until they're satisfied.

    Take a look at your navigation and search systems in your eLearning courses. Are users able to find what they're looking for using these tools? Make sure to leave them sufficient visual clues. The challenge for eLearning developers is to provide learners better access to the right kind of information—one that's complete, useful and reliable. Complete and integrated information is possible only when you have correlated data from different authentic sources. It's reliable when it has been proven true, and useful when it's applicable to learners' needs.

    3. Human beings are on an information diet.

    We're told that today's generation of learners and readers prefer bite-sized information to long-form articles or screens. That in lieu of reading, they just scan and surf. The Law of Surfing or the idea that we are all on an information diet aims to explain this. 

    It's not that learners are just lazy to exert effort. They actually aim to get maximum benefit through minimal effort. That's why they'll continue to surf and scan until they find good patches or ideal sources of information.

    All of these points should help you, the eLearning professional, assess the work you do for learners. What should you really focus on? The Information Foraging Theory wants you to make it easier for learners to find meaningful information and focus on creating desirable information. 

    Final advice: “Observe how your users approach information, consider what it means, and design to allow them to achieve what they need.”

    Further Reads:

    eLearning free ebook

     

    Click me
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla Gutierrez
    Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT. ES:Karla is an Inbound Marketer @Aura Interactiva, the developers of SHIFT.

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.