SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    Learner Experience Mapping: Building Personalized “Learner-centric” Experiences


    The term “Experience Mapping” isn’t a new one – it’s been around for a long time in retail sales settings. For instance, brick-and-mortar retailers have for years focused on providing their customers the best “experience” possible during shopping, by focusing on aspects such as product availability, price competitiveness, a variety of selection, “airiness” and openness of their shop floors, cleanliness, etc. 

    More recently, websites have been focusing on User Experience design (UX) to deliver valuable content to their users, based on some factors including: Usefulness, Credibility, Desirability, Usability, Accessibility and “Findability.”

    Learner Experience Mapping (LEM) has a similar philosophy, except that it focuses on delivering value in the learning process. Its objective is simple: View learning opportunities and experiences from the lens of those who are consuming the content.

    The key to delivering value to consumers, be they online shoppers, students or employees, is to deliver rich, personalized experiences as opposed to just providing a generic product or service.

    In the case of customer experiences, retailers map customer lifecycles from Need to Purchase, and from Use to Post sale support. Then, they tailor their products and services based on that map.

    The same logic works in the training world. To provide corporate learners fuller and richer learning experiences, organizations are starting to map the learner's path from recognizing learning needs to actual learning – and beyond. LEM is about moving the focus of training, from an instructional design to an experiential perspective – for the learner. It’s about going beyond just course design in order to boost learner satisfaction.

     LEM is about moving the focus of training, from an instructional design to an experiential perspective – for the learner

     

    The difference between traditional training design and  experience-based training design: 


    While conventional learning models had the organization controlling what, where and how an employee needed to learn, LEM puts that control into the hands of the learner. It maps learner experiences through various stages of progression, from building awareness of learning needs, to consuming learning and applying it on the job. 

    learning-experience

     

    What are Experience Maps? 

    Experience maps act as a visual interpretation of how a learner will interact with learning opportunities available to them within the organization, and the various resources offered to fulfill those opportunities along the different moments.

    LEM takes a holistic view of learning by offering an end-to-end experience to the learner, based on:

    • The specifics of the jobs that individuals will need to perform
    • The information, knowledge, people and company resources needed to succeed in that job, in the different stages
    • Individual preferences for how people are likely to learn – in-class, on the job, while commuting, or at home
    • The career paths learners are likely to aspire towards while employed with the organization
    • Additional learning experiences they might like to pursue to advance through those career paths

    LEM also recognizes that when the object of a particular learning initiative (i.e. the employee) takes control of his/her learning, it is more likely to provide them a more fulfilling and rewarding experience, than a company-enforced learning path.

     

    Key Components of A Learner Experience Map 

    Before building an eLearning or corporate training program in your company, it is important to consider the different learning journeys that specific segments of your workforce could potentially undertake. Using that insight, you can then identify potential pain points (that you need to address), and touch points (that employees may use to interact with training opportunities).

    A typical Learner Experience Map would comprise of the following:

    1) Learner Profile: This is the most important building block of your LEM, as it describes who the employee is, what their roles, goals, and aspirations are, and what potential learning opportunities they could typically need to succeed, and how (in-class, virtual class, mobile, desktop) they would usually consume learning content.

    2) Learning Paths:  Here’s where you would piece together various stages through which the learner will evolve while working for you; how they will evolve over time (e.g. Intern, Junior Associate, Assistant Manager, Sales Manager, Vice President of Sales…etc.); and what types of learning support might they require. 

    3) Touch Points and Pain Points: Each of the above evolutions should be supplemented with appropriate learning opportunities and resources. Here’s where you identify what a learner might be doing (e.g.: Familiarizing themselves with the company’s product line), and how the employee will reach out and “touch” the company’s learning resources to support what they are doing. It is here that you will also identify pain points (or barriers) to successful learning.

    4) Timelines: You now need to put some realistic timelines around how the employee will progress through alternate paths that they “touch.” For instance, if an employee is looking for specific policy guidance, how long will it take your company’s learning environment to provide her/him with all the knowledge they require.

    5) Mode: This is where you identify various modes of interaction. For instance, touch points could occur via emails, corporate websites (inquiry forms), social media interactions, in-class sessions, virtual or eLearning, or Chat Rooms. You should examine all the available channels for delivering learning content to this employee based on his/her Learner Profile.

    For instance, a 68-year old mid-level executive on the verge of retirement will (typically) not seek learning experiences on social media. Therefore, in-class, face-to-face delivery modes should be made available to anyone with such a profile.

    6)   Integrating it all: For LEM to be successful, you need to integrate the map with each employee’s career progression. As he/she moves through the designated learning path, the company must have updated, appropriate and preferably real-time, learning resources to support the learner  

    You may use several approaches to build LEMs. Some are text-based, some may be tabular, many use narratives and others may be graphical models that are color-coded to provide visual stimulus.

    Here is a great guide on how to create a learning journey map. They use this helpful spreadsheet to start mapping. 

     

    See these examples for inspiration:

     

     

     

    slide_10.jpg

     

    There are a number of resources online that you can access to get started, but regardless of what approach you take, you need to ensure that you at least include the 6 major components discussed above. 

    Recommended read: Learner Experience Design: The Core of Active Deep Learning

     


    Sources:

    Learner as Customer: Implications & opportunities for corporate learning functions

    Learner Journey Mapping for #LXDesign

    LX Journey Mapping Workshop

    Experience maps, user journeys and more…

    Using Design Thinking to Embed Learning in Our Jobs 

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.