SHIFT's eLearning Blog

Our blog provides the best practices, tips, and inspiration for corporate training, instructional design, eLearning and mLearning.

To visit the Spanish blog, click here
    All Posts

    The Key Components of a Learner-Friendly eLearning Course

    It's so easy to assume the content is all that matters in an eLearning course. But, how information is presented affects its effectiveness. The design, for instance, influences how students interact with information.

    Think about one of your existing eLearning course designs: Is it too cluttered? Or is it designed to properly guide learners toward clear goals? 

    It goes without saying that for any learning environment to be effective, you have to think of the holistic learner experience. 

    Here are four crucial factors that should consider:

    • Graphic Clarity
    • Readability 
    • Usability
    • Learnability

    1. Graphic Clarity

    This principle of good design goes beyond how the screen looks. It is rather focused on how the screen conveys information—the form. 

    Remember, the goal is always to communicate information in the clearest and most accurate way possible. Design should be consistent and aesthetically pleasing to guide the learner every step of the way. Your use of graphics shouldn't be for mere decoration or for filling an empty space. Every graphic element should contribute to the educational purpose of your material and help students achieve their learning goals. 

    Take a look at any screen right now. Does it actually "inform" or promote better communication? If it easily distracts, then you're nowhere near achieving graphic clarity. Be mindful of the learner's cognitive load.

    Some helpful tips: Take away the clutter by getting rid of those elements that obscure your message.  A cluttered screen makes it harder for the eyes to read. But a simple, clear design—one that guides the eyes smoothly along with the screen—definitely makes learning much more effective. You can use or combine different elements from lines, color, or whitespace to create a visual flow and guide learners to their ultimate goal.  

    Recommended read: How To Avoid Designing Cluttered eLearning Screens

    2. Readability 

    Readability on screen is quite different from readability on traditional mediums like paper. This is mainly because the information is presented differently online.

    Remember, students don't only read chunks of paragraphs online. They also interact with information in a lot of ways. They click on a link and hover their mouse on a particular image or location. These links and annotations allow them more access to information.

    Good readability, then, is about helping your students understand the content. If the text can't be read easily, for instance, then your material simply fails to deliver. Since readability is an essential aspect of comprehension, it's necessary to consider the ease with which students can read the text. Can they scan it quickly? Even on different browsers and devices? What about the hover text? Can they recognize links? 

    3. Usability 

    You probably have heard a lot about usability these days. But what is it really?

    Jakob Nielsen of the Nielsen Norman Group defines usability as “a quality attribute that assesses how easy user interfaces are to use.”

    In the eLearning field, usability considers how user interfaces easily allow students to perform typical learning-related tasks. When a student views a screen, the primary question is whether that screen is usable for their purpose as a student?

    Let's take an eLearning course you've created. Can students easily navigate their way from screen to screen? Can they effortlessly move back and forward or wherever they need to get to? And once they get to their intended screen, can they intuitively do what they're supposed to do? If the answer is yes, then there's no doubt that your material scores high in terms of usability.

    To check for usability, watch out for broken navigation links, cluttered navigation systems, vague menu options and labels, non-descriptive titles or pages, and missing images or graphics.

    Also read:

    How Usable is Your eLearning Course? Follow the 5 E’s For Best Results

    Don't Frustrate Your Learners! 7 Rules for Creating User-Friendly eLearning
     

    4. Learnability 

    People often confuse learnability with usability. While these two are similar concepts, they are a bit different.

    Based on several works by authors such as McLuhan, Arnheim, and Elkins, learnability considers how well a page or screen promotes learning and thinking. To test for the "learnability" of an eLearning course, professionals would have to ask “How learnable is the course?” or “Does this screen help people learn?”

    These questions focus on learning-centered usability. The page or screen may be usable. It may enable students to complete tasks. But does it actually help them learn? Obviously, usability and learnability are inextricably linked. One cannot exist without the other. 

    To check whether an interface is "learnable," it has to present material in such a way that it encourages students to learn. Instead of just relying on dry and informational-thin PowerPoint slides or simply moving traditional format to the web,  for instance, the screen has to fully take advantage of effective design and instructional design principles that best adapt to online screens. 

    Recommended reads: 

    Understand These 10 Principles of Good Design Before You Start Your Next eLearning Project

    Use These 5 Instructional Design Strategies to Create an Effective eLearning Course

    visual design crash course

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Game Level: Why Adaptive Learning Software Beats a Static Leaderboard

    Let’s rip the band-aid off: Leaderboards are the "participation trophies" of corporate training. Sure, they work for the top 5% of your hyper-competitive salespeople. But for the other 95% of your workforce? A leaderboard isn't motivating. It’s a public reminder that they are "losing." Once an employee realizes they can’t crack the Top 10, they check out. Game over. If you want to create a true addiction to learning, the kind that keeps gamers glued to screens for hours, you don’t need a scoreboard. You need Flow. Video games are addictive because they adapt to the player. Level 1 is easy. Level 50 is brutal. If the game stayed at "Level 1" difficulty forever, you’d get bored and quit. If it started at "Level 50," you’d get frustrated and quit. This is where traditional eLearning fails, and where adaptive learning software changes the game entirely.

    How the Hook Model Turns Gamification into High-Performance Habits

    We all know the feeling: You open an app "just for a second," and suddenly 20 minutes have passed. You were engaged, focused, and maybe even enjoying yourself. Now, imagine if your employees felt that way about your corporate gamification strategy. For too long, L&D has treated gamification as a visual layer, slapping a leaderboard on a PDF and calling it a day. But true gamification isn’t about points; it’s about psychology. It’s about creating a "Learning Loop" that feels natural, rewarding, and yes, habit-forming. To move beyond superficial badges, we need to look at the engine behind the world’s most engaging apps: Nir Eyal’s Hook Model. Here is how you can use this 4-step framework to build a gamification strategy that drives real performance.

    Why Badges Don't Work: The Psychology of Addictive Corporate Training

    Let’s be honest: Your top sales executive doesn’t care about a digital "Gold Star" for finishing a compliance video. They don’t want a "Subject Matter Ninja" badge for clicking Next fifty times. If your corporate gamification strategy relies entirely on leaderboards and stickers, you aren't gamifying learning—you’re patronizing your workforce. For years, the L&D industry has confused "gamification" with "decoration." We took boring, static slides and plastered points on top of them, expecting engagement numbers to skyrocket. Instead, we got employees who click through content just to make the notifications stop. To fix engagement, we must stop designing for children and start designing for the adult brain.